Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The case of Caster Semenya provides a vivid illustration of the ways in which natural genetic variation can generate large differences in athletic performance. But since we normally segregate athletic sports along the lines of this particular variation-gender-her case also highlights problems with the current approach to justice in sporting competition. Female athletes seem to have a valid complaint when they are made to compete against athletes who are, in one sense or another, male. But once we recognise that gender is not a binary quantity, sex segregation in competitive sport must be seen as an inconsistent and unjust policy, no matter what stance we take on the goals of sport or on the regulation of doping.

Original publication

DOI

10.1136/bjsm.2010.071639

Type

Journal article

Journal

Br J Sports Med

Publication Date

12/2011

Volume

45

Pages

1184 - 1188

Keywords

Athletes, Athletic Performance, Attitude to Health, Disorders of Sex Development, Doping in Sports, Female, Genetic Variation, Humans, Male, Prejudice, Sex Characteristics, Sex Determination Analysis, Testosterone