Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Is it justified to detect minor genetic aberrations before birth and terminate pregnancies based upon such information? We present the case of a woman who wanted Prenatal Diagnosis (PND) to detect whether her female fetus was a Haemophilia mutation carrier. Such carriers are usually healthy. She wished to eradicate the Haemophilia mutation from her family to avoid future generations being affected and to protect her children from having to go through PND themselves. We explore existing guidelines, public attitudes and possible objections to providing PND for minor abnormalities. We argue that in a society where couples have considerable autonomy relating to decisions about the fetus at least until viability, the routine restriction of PND for minor genetic abnormalities would be an unjust infringement of individual liberty.

Original publication

DOI

10.1162/152651603322781648

Type

Journal article

Journal

Am J Bioeth

Publication Date

2003

Volume

3

Keywords

Analytical Approach, Genetics and Reproduction, Abortion, Eugenic, Attitude of Health Personnel, Congenital Abnormalities, Female, Fetus, Hemophilia A, Heterozygote, Humans, Internationality, Male, Personal Autonomy, Preimplantation Diagnosis, Prenatal Diagnosis, Public Opinion