Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Recent findings in cognitive neuroscience have revealed that some patients previously diagnosed as being in a vegetative state may retain some degree of covert awareness. However, it is unclear whether such findings should be disclosed to the families of these patients. Concerns about the preservation of scientific validity, reliability of results and potential harms associated with disclosure suggest that individual research results should be disclosed only under certain conditions. In the following paper, we offer four criteria for the disclosure of individual research results. Because the results of functional neuroimaging studies to detect covert awareness in vegetative patients are scientifically valid, informative and reasonably reliable and have considerable potential benefit for the patient, researchers have an obligation to disclose such results to family members. Further work is needed to develop educational materials for families and to systematically study the impact of disclosure on the families themselves.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1136/medethics-2014-102078

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2015-07-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

41

Pages

534 - 538

Total pages

4

Keywords

Consciousness, Informed Consent, Neuroethics, Neuroimaging, Research Ethics, Awareness, Biomedical Research, Disclosure, Family, Female, Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Male, Neuroimaging, Persistent Vegetative State, Reproducibility of Results