Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

In this article, I begin to develop an account of bodily trespass – a specification of the conditions under which one person infringes another’s right against bodily interference. I first offer a minimal account, intended to capture only the clear cases of bodily trespass. On this account, bodily trespass consists in either bodily touching or significant, non-psychologically-mediated bodily alteration. I then consider whether this account should be broadened to accommodate some plausible, though non-obvious, cases of bodily trespass. These are cases in which a bodily alteration is produced via psychological processes in the target. I argue that, in deciding whether to accommodate such cases within our account, we face a dilemma, and one of considerable practical significance.

Type

Journal

Analysis

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Publication Date

27/03/2025

Keywords

bodily interference, bodily trespass, bodily integrity