Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

In addressing the question whether religion should be permitted a seat at the table of bioethics, and specifically where abortion is discussed, I argue that the question requires first some disambiguation. There is a sense in which the answer is obviously affirmative, but also a sense in which the answer is problematic. In particular, when it comes to bioethical discussion about the appropriate scope of the healthcare profession and about policy making, I argue that religion itself is neither sufficient nor necessary for deliberating about abortion in liberal societies. However, even if its role is neither sufficient nor necessary, religion can still have an important role to play in that kind of deliberation. Its values and norms can be grounded in non-religious views, such as natural law theory, that are relevant indeed to bioethical discussion on abortion. Thus, religion – and particularly Christianity - can be one route into that kind of bioethical discussion for many people. However, while these values and norms might well be valid and widely supported, they are also open to public scrutiny, political negotiation, and, in some cases, defeat. Those supporting the role of religion in bioethical discussion on abortion would need to accept this implication.



Book title

“Bioethics and Religion: Exploring the Intersection

Publication Date