Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

In our book Unfit for the Future and a number of papers, we have argued that there is a dangerous mismatch between, on the one hand, the tremendous power of scientific technology, which has created societies with millions of citizens, and, on the other hand, our moral capacities, which have been shaped by evolution for life in small, close-knit societies with primitive technology. To overcome this mismatch before it results in the downfall of human civilization, human beings stand in acute need of moral enhancement, not only by traditional means but also by biomedical means, should this turn out to be possible. After summarizing this argument, we respond to two critics, Michael Hauskeller and Robert Sparrow.

Original publication

DOI

10.1017/S0963180114000292

Type

Journal article

Journal

Camb Q Healthc Ethics

Publication Date

01/2015

Volume

24

Pages

48 - 57

Keywords

Biomedical Enhancement, Bioterrorism, Evidence-Based Medicine, Human Characteristics, Humans, Industrial Development, Morals, Motivation, Nuclear Weapons, Personality, Social Values