Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

We conducted focus groups to assess patient attitudes toward research on medical practices in the context of usual care. We found that patients focus on the implications of this research for their relationship with and trust in their physicians. Patients view research on medical practices as separate from usual care, demanding dissemination of information and in most cases, individual consent. Patients expect information about this research to come through their physician, whom they rely on to identify and filter associated risks. In general, patients support this research, but worry that participation in research involving randomization may undermine individualized care that acknowledges their unique medical histories. These findings suggest the need for public education on variation in practice among physicians and the need for a collaborative approach to the governance of research on medical practices that addresses core values of trust, transparency, and partnership.

Original publication




Journal article


Am J Bioeth

Publication Date





4 - 17


learning health system, randomization, research ethics, shared decision making, trust, Confounding Factors (Epidemiology), Cooperative Behavior, Decision Making, Ethics, Research, Focus Groups, Humans, Information Dissemination, Informed Consent, Learning, Medical Records, Patient Participation, Personal Autonomy, Physician-Patient Relations, Precision Medicine, Qualitative Research, Random Allocation, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Trust