Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Abortion is largely accepted even for reasons that do not have anything to do with the fetus' health. By showing that (1) both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons, (2) the fact that both are potential persons is morally irrelevant and (3) adoption is not always in the best interest of actual people, the authors argue that what we call 'after-birth abortion' (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled.

Original publication




Journal article


J Med Ethics

Publication Date





261 - 263


Abortion, adoption, allocation of healthcare resources, enhancement, euthanasia, in vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer, infanticide, potentiality, religious ethics, Abortion, Induced, Adoption, Beginning of Human Life, Congenital Abnormalities, Ethical Analysis, Fetal Viability, Homicide, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infanticide, Moral Obligations, Morals, Mothers, Personhood, Value of Life, Women's Health