Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The American Psychiatric Association released the fifth edition of its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) in May 2013 amid criticism from the British Psychological Society and other eminent voices. Among DSM-5’s problems are its over-emphasis on biological causes of mental distress and its classification of arguably normal states as disorders. We explain why these strategies are harmful and argue that the purpose of psychiatry—and of medicine generally—must be reconsidered if advances in medicine are to be effective in benefiting people. We advance an alternative framework in which medicine focuses not on disease but on psychological traits that, combined with other factors, reduce well-being. This ‘welfarist’ approach could avoid many problems encountered on the current model, bring order to those aspects of current medical practice that do not focus on curing disease, and target undesirable states regardless of whether they are symptomatic of disease. We call such states ‘psychological disadvantage’.

Type

Journal article

Journal

Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology

Publication Date

06/12/2018

Keywords

over-diagnosis, welfarism, disease, mental health, enhancement, psychiatric classification