Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

This paper argues that the provision of effective informed consent by surgical patients requires the disclosure of material information about the comparative clinical performance of available surgeons. We develop a new ethical argument for the conclusion that comparative information about surgeons' performance--surgeons' report cards--should be provided to patients, a conclusion that has already been supported by legal and economic arguments. We consider some recent institutional and legal developments in this area, and we respond to some common objections to the use of report cards on the clinical performance of surgeons.

Original publication

DOI

10.1076/jmep.29.1.11.30415

Type

Journal article

Journal

J Med Philos

Publication Date

02/2004

Volume

29

Pages

11 - 35

Keywords

Analytical Approach, Professional Patient Relationship, Benchmarking, Clinical Competence, Disclosure, Ethics, Medical, Humans, Informed Consent, Quality of Health Care, Risk, Surgical Procedures, Operative